It all started when Ben,
knowing my interest in WWII history, sent me this movie with the header “Some
of the grittiest WW2 footage you’ll watch today!”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6yEK1NtRbE
And it
was! The Tiger tanks looked like Tigers, the Shermans looked like Shermans,
even the 57-mm anti-tank gun looked good. I can let it slide that the bazooka
looked like an M20 3.5-inch rather than an M9 2.36-inch weapon.
I commented, “It’s
actually more historically accurate and has a better script than that Bulge
movie with Henry Fonda and Telly Savalas.”
Ben
said, “Didn’t Eisenhower come out of retirement just to denounce that film?
Seems like I remember hearing that.”
Well,
that was a new one to me, so I Googled it and damned if it wasn’t true. Ike did
indeed put down the latest Zan Gray novel to come out and hold a press
conference in which he condemned the film for “gross historical inaccuracy.” He
also commented that, personally, the film, “Left a bad taste in my mouth, like
a dog-shit C-ration.”
Since
Hollywood’s present offerings are such pathetic, predictable cookie-cutter
displays of political correctness…I can’t even remember the last time my wife
and I went out to a movie…it’s easy to forget that they still made some real
stinkers even back in the “good old days”. It wasn’t all Patton or The
Longest Day or A Bridge Too Far.
So I
got to thinking, was Battle of the Bulge really as Godawful BAD as
I remembered it?
To
answer that question, I took the time and trouble to locate and watch one of
the three existing copies of Battle of the Bulge, The Director’s Cut.
The Director’s Cut is indeed historical, having set a record for war movies as
being the only film about a battle that lasted longer than the actual battle itself.
The Director’s Cut runs 14,324 minutes, but Warner Brothers thankfully cut it
down to 167 minutes for the theatrical release. Considering that all the action
happens in the first and last few minutes, even that version is about 145
minutes too long.
It’s truly
amazing how completely this movie squanders and wastes so many assets and so
much potential. It had huge big-name star power for 1965: Henry Fonda, Telly
Savalas, Robert Shaw, Robert Ryan, Charles Bronson. The best part was that they
apparently rented every single armored battalion in the entire Spanish Army to
make this movie, so there’s plenty of real tanks to see in action.
That’s
very refreshing in these days of CGI battle scenes. Awhile back, we attempted
to watch a new war movie called The Last Drop but couldn’t slog all the
way through it despite some kind of cool CGI Focke-Wulf 190 strafing runs. Then
there’s the John Woo school of CGI which apparently teaches that NO plot or
character development whatsoever is necessary in a movie if you just shovel in
enough CGI battle scenes.
In a
really good war movie like Patton, I can overlook the whole “slap some
field gray paint and an iron cross on an old American M47 or M48 Patton tank and
call it a Panzer” thing. But in a really bad war movie like this one, it
somehow just makes it worse. The “Germans” run around in their invincible M47
Patton “King Tigers” while the Americans get slaughtered in their M24 Chaffee “Shermans.”
(Truth being stranger than fiction, that is just about what happened in the
early weeks of the Korean War when the US Army threw in its only available
armor in theater…four companies of M24 Chaffees…in toe-to-toe slugfests with
the Norks’ Soviet T-34-85s which ended in predictably tragic results.) In the Bulge,
the end result is something that begs for a military historians’ edition of Mystery
Science Theater 3000.
I can
almost hear Tom Servo doing a Movietone newsreel narrator voice: “Today, the
German Army launched a surprise winter attack across the sun-baked desert plains of
Belgium…”
"Today, the German Army launched a surprise attack across the sun-baked desert plains of Belgium."
Star
power is wasted even more pathetically than the cast of hundreds of real tanks.
Telly
Savalas’ character, US Army tank commander Sergeant Guffy, is so utterly devoid
of any redeeming qualities as a human being he makes “Maggott” from The
Dirty Dozen look like Mr. Rogers. Not even the US Army in 1944 would have
been hard-pressed enough to actually make such a cretin a non-commissioned
officer. It’s hard to root for such an utterly detestable “good guy” in a
movie. If he had been my TC in an actual war, I would have put a couple of .45s into his back the moment
the ramp dropped on Omaha Beach. The Tasmanian Devil would be a better tank
commander, not to mention being more sympatico and coherent as a character.
Henry
Fonda seemed like he would be a genuinely likeable guy in person, someone you’d
like the pal around with, and as an actor he had some great performances before
and after this stinker. The Grapes of Wrath, Twelve Angry Men, On Golden Pond. But in this one, his character, Lieutenant Colonel Dan
Kiley, is so bland and mild and unmotivated that not even Henry can make him
all that interesting or likeable. The best scene to watch for is when Kiley
attempts to pick of the German panzer commander at a bridge crossing but can’t
because his M1 Garand rifle has no rear sight!
In the
Director’s Cut version, you do at least get to see the moment when Robert Shaw realizes
just how bad this movie really is. A look comes over his face that’s a mixture
of shell shock and an urgent need to projectile vomit. At that point, he breaks
off singing Panzerlied, loses his Prussian accent, and starts colorfully
telling a slightly slurred tale of the sinking of the USS Indianapolis in an attempt to
create at least one memorable screen moment in this film. Realizing that
nothing can save this script, he gives up on that too and just chugs bottle
after bottle of schnapps through the remainder of the movie.
Charles
Bronson’s character Wolenski is so forgettable that I forgot Bronson was even
in the movie.
The
only remotely likeable character was Hans Christian Blech as Corporal Conrad, German
Colonel Hessler’s old, disillusioned staff car driver. And he’s only likeable
because he reminded me a little bit of Sergeant Schultz from Hogan’s Heroes.
In the
end of this movie, the heroic resistance put up by General Anthony “Nuts” McAuliffe’s
GIs and paratroopers in Bastogne did nothing to defeat the Wehrmacht. General
George S. Patton Jr.’s 3rd Army apparently never got around to
mounting a brilliantly successful counter-attack from the flank through snowstorms and over icy roads. The weather did not clear and
allow General Elwood “Pete” Quesada’s feared Jabos to blow the shit out
of round-bound German columns. In fact, you could get the impression that the
US Army didn’t really do anything to defeat the Germans at all.
Nope.
The panzers happened to simultaneously run out of gas, so every last German soldier in
Army Group B just threw down his rifle and walked on home.
So, if
you are fortunate enough to have never seen this movie, spare yourself and don’t
lose 167 minutes of your life (it seems a great deal longer) that you’ll never
get back. You'll get more out of four minutes of Lego action!
No comments:
Post a Comment