Wednesday, January 13, 2010


NASA Earth ObservatoryDecember temperatures compared to average December temps recorded between 2000 and 2008. Blue points to colder than average land surface temperatures, while red indicates warmer temperatures.

From Miami to Maine, Savannah to Seattle, America is caught in an icy grip that one
of the U.N.'s top global warming proponents says could mark the beginning of a
mini ice age.

Oranges are freezing and millions of tropical fish are dying in Florida, and it could be just the beginning of a decades-long deep freeze, says Professor Mojib Latif, one of the world's leading climate modelers.

Latif thinks the cold snap Americans have been suffering through is only
the beginning. He says we're in for 30 years of cooler temperatures -- a mini
ice age, he calls it, basing his theory on an analysis of natural cycles in
water temperatures in the world's oceans.

Naturally, professor Mojib noted that this new mini ice age is all within the greater context of global warming. He also added, "The check's in the mail, we won't raises taxes, I'll call you, and if you keep watching Lost it will make sense."
The global whining fanatics are getting more desperate these days. All their "adjusted" figures, rigged computer models, data manipulation, and outright lies are alkl floating like turds to the surface of the scientific cess pool, exposed to the light of day. With the state-run media's deathgrip on information dissemination slipping more and more every day, that darned old truth is filtering out to the public. When provided with real information, even many sheeple are capabale of making intelligent decisions.

For instance, a poll of Americans revealed that hardly more than a third still believe global warming is a "grave threat". Recent opinion polls in Great Britain have found that 52% of the people are not worried about global warming anymore. Like our current Whitehouse denziens, the Brit government is not one to let a good crisis "go to waste". The Department of Energy and Climate Change shelled out some 5.75 million pounds of the people's money for an ad campaign to convince the people they must not think for themselves, especially with British politicians trying to take the lead of the Big Boys of First World countries seeking to become Third World countries in Copenhagen.

The news is even starting to slip by the media blockade that the universal scientific consensus on global warming might not be, well, a universal scientific consensus. They now scoff at the 1970's Coming Ice Age scare as totally different than the global warming scare because there was not a real consensus of scientists and an alarmist media blew it out of proportion. Speaking of lack of consensus and an alarmist media...

Survey: Less Than Half of all Published Scientists Endorse Global Warming Theory
Of 528 total papers on climate change, only 38 (7%) gave an explicit endorsement of the consensus. If one considers "implicit" endorsement (accepting the consensus without explicit statement), the figure rises to 45%. However, while only 32 papers (6%) reject the consensus outright, the largest category (48%) are neutral papers, refusing to either accept or reject the hypothesis. This is no "consensus."

The figures are even more shocking when one remembers the watered-down definition of consensus here. Not only does it not require supporting that man is the "primary" cause of warming, but it doesn't require any belief or support for "catastrophic" global warming. In fact of all papers published in this period (2004 to February 2007), only a single one makes any reference to climate change leading to catastrophic results.

As Agent Mulder would say, "The truth is out there." And, I would add, with the political elite's and their state-run media lapdogs' embargo on information steadily crumbling, more and more people are realizing that. Whether or not enough sheeple get the message before the "ruling elite" destroy us is another matter.

No comments: