RINOS: OBAMA DOESN'T HAVE A MONOPOLY ON STUPID

They're baaacccckkkkk! Top RINO idiots, our old pals Juan McStain (R: Sonora) and Lindsey Grahamnesty (R: Wolkenkuckucksheim), angry that the Dems are trying to gain a completely monopoly on stupidity and waste, are trying to make a comeback...and some m0ney, I'm sure...and get some face time on TV.

Figuring we haven't butted into everyone else's business around the globe and pissed enough countries off yet, and that we have too much taxpayer money and need to spend some more, these two RINOs are leading the charge to have the U.S. rebuild Libya. More "nation building"! Yeah! It worked so well in Iraq and Afghanistan, let's try it again.

Wasn't Einstein's definition of insanity doing the exact same thing over and over again but expecting a different result?

Ah, there's nothing to make you feel powerful like a little "nation building". Bomb the shit out of them, force some good ol' American "democracy" and "freedom" down their throats whether they want it or not, spend billions of borrowed money we don't have rebuilding their country, wind up occupying it for a decade or two until not just the new regime, which has already adopted Sharia law, but the man in the street also starts blowing up our troops and exporting terrorism here because we've long since worn out our welcome, if any. Meanwhile, our own debt skyrockets and our own infrastructure crumbles while whatever regime in power in our own country slides swiftly towards a police state to assure the government keeps accumulating power and money no matter how badly they &$%# things up. Did I miss anything in the process?

Oh yeah, "nation building" calls for lots of no-bid contracts for "entrepreneurs" like Halliburton, Brown, and Root to send in their "private contractors" to make obscene amounts of money hand-over-fist, much of which will probably find its way into the pockets of people like, well, like...McCain and Graham for instance. Happy ending again.

McStain, putting down his crack pipe, told Faux News “They’re willing to reimburse us. It’s not a matter of money."

Senator Grahamnesty apparently dropped acid before explaining, “So we’ll get our money back, but the one thing we can’t get back is an opportunity. And this is an opportunity to take a dictatorship, the mad dog of the Mideast, and replace him with people who live in peace with us. “We can do business, have economic ties that will allow American business to prosper from a free Libya. So I know we’re broke [obviously he doesn't], but if you disengage the world, you’ll regret it and if we miss this opportunity, we’ll regret it.”

McCain then said, "It won't cost the U.S. taxpayer a dime!" Both Senators stifled laughs.

"The check's in the mail." This, from Grahamnesty, caused them both to snort and snigger.

"I won't come in your mouth!"

"We won't raise taxes!"

The senators then chanted in unison, "Free trade with all, entangling alliances with none!" Immediately afterwards they rolled on the floor in uncontrolled mirth and laughter."

Finally they were able to regain their composure and take their seats again, gasping and still wiping tears of helpless laughter from their eyes. Before the commentator could ask them another question, McCain leaned toward Grahamnesty and whispered, "Constitution."

At which point they again fell out of their chairs doubled over with weeping, hysterical laughter, clutching at their sides and kicking their feet in the air.

Finally, they ended the interview by picking up a pair of fiddles. "This is a little number I like to call Rome is Burning," said McCain, "And a one, and a two..."

At least their fiddles were in tune with Obama's.

John McCain PERSONALLY Patrolling Border

Border hawk and stalwart conservative (that's sarcasm by the way) Arizona Senator John McCain has had enough of illegal immigration! He's released a new campaign commercial where he and Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu walk along what is apparently the Mexican border. While the two keep a sharp eye out for smugglers and desperadoes, they chat about (appropriately enough) border security. Sheriff Babeu tells McCain that the senator's border plan is "perfect."

Babeu is of course referring to McCain's new election year plan, which involves sending National Guardsmen to the border, hiring 3,000 new border control agents and completing the border fence, not McCain's old non-election year plans which involve not building a fence, not hiring new border agents, not sending the Guard, as well as granting amnesty to the illegal aliens who already broke our laws. At the end of the commercial, Sheriff Babeu tells McCain that "you're one of us." (If Babeu is referring to humans in general or Americans in particular, he's sadly mistaken.)

Here's the commercial, but before you watch it, beware: Glenn Beck warned that the ad may cause viewers to vomit and some are calling it "The Worst 'Danged' Political Ad in History!"



[Update: By the way, I realize that building the "danged fence" is no panacea and the conservative border hawk policies won't end illegal immigration. We also need to streamline and widen the channels for legal immigration and temporary worker programs. Drug trafficking across the border (and the violence that goes with it) won't be seriously curtailed until the feds end their unconstitutional drug prohibition in this country. But regardless of what you feel the proper border and immigration policies should be, can anyone respect such a disingenuous, shape-shifting S.O.B. as John McCain?]

Election Year McCain a True Conservative

Arizona Senator John McCain has apparently seen the light on the issue of border security. He introduced a bill recently which would build new border fences, request 3,000 National Guardsmen be sent to the Arizona border, hire 3,000 new Border Protection agents and require that illegal border-crossers be charged with a crime and imprisoned before deportation. This may seem like a stark reversal from the Senator McCain who has sandbagged additional border protections and even worked with Senator Ted Kennedy on an “amnesty” for illegal aliens in 2005.

Only a complete cynic could think that McCain’s sudden change of heart is because he is facing a tough primary challenge from the right. His Republican challenger J.D. Hayworth said: "Had McCain supported my efforts in 2005 to secure the U.S. border, rather than stubbornly supporting amnesty, we would not be trying to apply quick fixes today."

However, it appears that McCain is moving right on a number of issues, such as gay rights and global warming, and has “disavowed his long-standing maverick label.”

For instance, McCain, who used to use the original draft of the Constitution to mop up spilled scotch on his desk, has new-found respect for the document. “I have always been a steadfast supporter of the uh... Constimahoozie,” McCain said, posing for photographers with his arm around a wax mannequin of Barry Goldwater, “especially the 2nd and 10th things.”

Not content with mere words, McCain has also introduced the “I’m a REAL Conservative, Not a Phony Douchebag Act of 2010” in the Senate. Among other things, the bill would change the name of Washington D.C. to Reaganton D.C. (with D.C. then standing for “Dominion of Christ). While McCain once called for severe restrictions on gun shows and mandatory “safe-storage” of firearms, his new bill would make gun show attendance compulsory and would require loaded firearms to be strewn about in the open.

Another reversal comes on the subject of torture. McCain previously opposed use of torture by the CIA against terrorism suspects. He now has changed his mind.

“Now I support torture… for every body!” McCain shouted over a John Philip Sousa tune at a recent campaign rally, riding on the back of an elephant and wearing a Ronald Reagan mask.

He proceeded: “My friends did you know that I know Sarah Palin? We totally got it on, Dude. I had to break it off though. She got too clingy. Don’t roll your eyes at me, punk! You ungrateful little sh*ts would be speaking North Vietnamese if it wasn’t for me! Were you a martyr for your country like me? Didn’t think so. Hey come back here!

"I’m cold. I need my shawl… and my back pills. Me and Ronald Reagan go way back too. He wanted to surrender to the Soviets, but I convinced him not to, my friends. Who you callin’ ‘full of sh*t?’ You kids keep your damned bikes off my lawn! Where are you going?

"Oh dear, I’ve soiled myself. I’ve had that problem since 1968 when Charlie stuck a pipe wrench up my ass. I think I finally told them Lady Bird Johnson’s hat size that time! I used to play tiddlywinks with Lincoln too….. Come back!"

Support J.D. Hayworth, the UN-McCain

Even if you don't live in Arizona, you have a stake in this election as the winner will be voting on laws that effect us all. AZ Senator John McCain has been no friend to U.S. gun owners and patriots. J.D. Hayworth, the candidate running against McCain for the GOP nomination, would fight for the cause of freedom. A few examples:

• Hayworth: "A" rated and endorsed by Gun Owners of America, "A" rated by NRA; McCain: Appeared in commercials for gun ban group, authored anti-gun show legislation, opposed arming pilots after 9-11 (wanted to give them stun guns instead)
• Hayworth: Helped write tax cuts of 2001 & 2003; McCain: Opposed tax cuts
• Hayworth: Opposed TARP; McCain: Supported TARP, wanted to dump $300 billion more into it
• Hayworth: Opposed auto bailouts for big unions; McCain: Supported them.
• Hayworth: Opposes the cap & tax legislation that would hobble U.S. economy; McCain: Co-wrote cap & tax legislation
• Hayworth: Opposes amnesty for illegal aliens that would make the rule of law a joke; McCain: Co-wrote the McCain-Kennedy Amnesty bill that the Heritage Foundation estimated would cost taxpayers $2.6 Trillion

For more information check out J.D.'s website.
Rest assured that "Mr. Campaign Finance Reform" John McCain will be raking in millions of dollars from powerful special interests and the establishment apparatus. If Hayworth is to have a chance against this entrenched Washington insider, it's up to "we the people." Please DONATE to his campaign, even if it's only a few dollars.
It's time for McCain to go.

JOHN MCCAIN LEADS THE "NEW" GOP IN ITS CHARGE INTO MORE LIBERALISM...AND INTO THE VALLEY OF DEATH RODE THE 600

It’s been painfully obvious to me for quite some time that the GOP, especially the RNC, doesn’t want any input from the rank and file. In fact, they’ve gotten to the point of trying to shut their base out of the process altogether. I think the support Ron Paul got scared the poop out of them the most. They feared he would listen to the people, obey the Constitution, and not dance correctly when they pulled the strings.

One of the ways to negate the threat of a free conservative candidate was discovered by the Montana GOP. They now have a spiffy new “caucus” several weeks before the actual primaries for electing a presidential candidate. In these cauci, only a tiny select handful of hand-picked GOP party faithful….1,300 in the whole state if IIRC…are allowed to cast votes. Oh, sometimes, they’ll put on a little dog-and-pony show where they allow the public to stand up and bitch or pitch for their choice, but then they totally ignore the base rubes and go ahead and pick whomever their party handlers told them to pick. There is still a “real” primary election later on where the peasants are allowed to vote, but the choice has already long since become a done deal.

Likewise, if you oppose the choice your betters have selected for you, they don’t want to hear about it. Emails and letters to both the state GOP and RNC go unanswered if you don’t agree with them. Hell, even if you send him a “You’re doing a *&$#$^ job!” letter, increasingly left-leaning Democrat Senator Max Baucus at least bothers to respond, even if those responses are pretty much just form letters. The GOP ignores and snubs their own base.

Of course, they still find the time to constantly contact you with e-mails and fliers in which they pat themselves on the back for doing such a great job and then demand more money from you. I feel sorry for RNC Chairman Michael Steele, who apparently is delusional and going off the deep end. The last time I heard from him in a Beg-A-Thon letter he addressed me as “Dear fellow conservative”. Fellow conservative?!?!? Oh, I got a good laugh over that knee-slapper.

So basically…and this goes for both parties…your “betters” are gonna run the show with as little input from the washed masses as possible. Notice how the tea parties and town hall protests scare the living daylights out of them and they and the state-run media do their best to ignore and then marginalize the voice of the people. My God, you give them an inch and the next thing you know they’ll be wanting a Constitutional republic or something.

No, fellow citizen, it is your job to shut the hell up, give lots of money, and vote when and for whom you’re told to. Then, in the aftermath of the fiasco, our “betters” can sit around scratching their head and wondering why their ever-faithful (“Where else they gonna go?”) base voting block either stayed home or voted third party.

Well, the Vichy Republican neo-cons are not longer scratching their heads over their staggering losses. Nope, they ain’t gonna let that horse throw them. They’re climbing right back up in the saddle to cleverly dish out big doses of the exact same crap that got them kicked in the nards before. That’s right, they’re using Juan “Amnesty” McCain’s failing formula…”Sidestep march! left-left-left!”… but essentially putting it on steroids now.

Judas John is involved big time in crafting, along with the rest of the RINO’s, a “makeover” of the GOP. Makeover, of course, meaning more of the same crap that failed so miserably before. Good plan, Juan. Here’s the Politico’s take on that, from wence comes RedState Erick Erickson’s take in the Politico.

“I’m sure John McCain has a lot of political favors he wants to return in 2010, but I don’t trust his views of who a winning candidate is anymore than I trust his ability to pick a winning campaign staff,” he said. “McCain has never really been a conservative, so I wouldn’t be surprised if he’s picking non-conservative candidates.”
Juan is jumping up to support lots of wishy-washy left-leaning neo-con RINO’s who “share his values”. One obvious example is McCain and the other RNC neo-con weenies backing slimy, limp-wristed, liberal-leaning “Windsock Charlie” Crist over real conservative Marco Rubio in the nomination for the Republican Senatorial race in Florida. Beltway buffoon Brian Walsh of the National Republican Senatorial Committee is right there with McCain. Judging from their reactions, they would gladly push Karl Marx himself as a GOP candidate as long as he was willing to put an ( R ) behind his name. From the American Spectator.

But it was clearly unnecessary for the NRSC to put its thumb on the scale in Florida in favor of Crist, a man the conservative base of the Republican Party prays is not the future of the party. Cornyn and others in the national Republican establishment have created real enmity in the conservative base of the Florida party (and elsewhere where they've supported liberal candidates over conservatives). If only the conservative base could vote, neither Cornyn nor Crist could be elected assistant county rat-catcher anywhere in Florida. To them it is just one more example of the Republican Party sticking its thumb in the eyes of conservatives. Mention either Crist or Cornyn to these folks and I hear verbs and adjectives (and the odd gerund) I've rarely encountered since I was a Sixth Fleet sailor.
It’s summed up as the winning strategy of, “Our liberals can beat your liberals.”

Not wanting to miss out, Steve Schmidt, the brilliant Rommel-like strategic genius who ran McCain’s 2008 campaign, also jumped on the Vichy bandwagon, decrying the dangers of letting actual conservatives loose in the party and, of course, tossing in some more Palin bashing for good measure while he was at it.

We could go on through a whole nationwide host of left-leaning neo-con RINO candidates Juan and the RNC boys are backing to the hilt, the same hilt that is thudding into the spines of conservatives getting stabbed in the back…again…by the GOP.

Once more, I gotta go back to the Bart Simpson and the electrified cupcake to find something close to parity with the greed, stupidity, and ability to learn of the Republicrat ruling elite these days.

Grab! Z-zap! Ow! Grab! Z-Zap! Ow! Grab! Z-Zap! Ow! Grab! Z-Zap! Ow!

NRA Smoking Crack?

The National Rifle Association's magazine articles usually have the same two-part contradictory message: 1]NRA has led gun owners to a ceaseless string of political victories (so send money). 2]Your gun rights have never been more in peril (so send money). While thumbing through this month's rag from the NRA, I happened upon an article by Dave Kopel, titled "Will The Supreme Court Set Speech Free?"

Unlike NRA's self-promoting magazine staff-writers, Kopel is an author, attorney and political scientist whose opinions I do respect. NRA must respect his opinions as well, since they often include his articles. I'll assume that, since they included this article in their publication, NRA agrees with the premise of the article.

The article begins: "Today, one of the gravest long-term threats to your Second Amendment rights is the weakening of your First Amendment rights--including your right as a member of the National Rifle Association to participate in free speech in the months before a federal election." The article is about the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA), which the Supreme Court is set to re-review this month.

The article calls the law "anathema to democracy." It contends that BCRA is actually worse than the Sedition Act of 1798, which punished criticizing government officials, because "if you could prove that your criticism [...] was accurate, then you would be entitled to an acquittal. In contrast, the BRCA restricts even truthful statements about federal candidates."

This mirrors the words of NRA Executive VP Wayne Lapierre, who, shortly after BCRA became law, called it "the most significant change in the First Amendment since the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798, which tried to make it a crime to criticize a member of Congress." The NRA quickly filed suit against the law at that time, but ultimately lost.

What does all this have to do with the NRA smoking crack? BCRA is more commonly known by the name "The McCain-Feingold Act." McCain as in Arizona Senator John McCain, who NRA endorsed for president in 2008.

McCain, who did commercials for the George Soros funded anti-Second Amendment group "Americans For Gun Safety." McCain, who sponsored legislation that could have shut down gunshows. John McCain who supported legislation that would "force federal agents to increase efforts in arresting and convicting honest gun owners who may inadvertently violate one of the many federal anti-gun laws, which punish mere technicalities, such as gun possession." McCain, who received an "F" grade from Gun Owners of America in 2004 and 2006.

This McCain:


I might have been able to let the NRA slide on its endorsement of this statist ogre. Perhaps it was just a one-time transgression by an organization frightened by the prospect of Barack Obama as president, I reasoned.

But when I flipped a few pages further in the magazine, I came across an article about NRA's annual "Celebration of American Values." Whose picture should I see, grimacing grotesquely behind the podium, as an honored speaker at the event? The king of the RINOs himself, Crash Bandicoot, aka John McCain. Apparently, in the NRA's view, authoring a bill that is "anathema to democracy" and constantly trying to shitcan the Constitution are "American values" to be "celebrated."

Come on NRA! Quit using MY dues money to promote this self-serving prick! He's just using you and will stab us in the back the next chance he gets. In the immortal words of Smash Mouth: "Put away the crack before the crack puts you away."

HE'S BAAAACCCKKK! JOHN MCCAIN DEFENDING OBAMA

At a town hall meeting on health care "reform" in Arizona, Juan "I Wanna Lose This Election!" McCain once again runs aground on the deadly shoals of those pesky conservative citizens. Still dragging out the pathetic cliches that worked so well for him last November...playing nice with the libs, "bipartisanship", Liberalism Lite...McCain also goes on to bravely defend President Zero for his staunch Constitutionalism. The crowd is not fooled, nor amused.

You can hardly blame good ol' Juan, though. According to the MSM, it is well known that Barack Hussien Obama is an absolutely brilliant Constitutional scholar (I hope he got better grades in those studies than he did in Economics 101; not that we'll ever know because all his school records are conveniently sealed for some reason) in addition to being the smartest man alive. For instance, without the resplendent Kenyanesian most of us peasants would not know that the U.S. Constitution was actually written some 2,000 years ago!

Obama the Wise has also reminded those dim-witted "Founding Father" Dead White Guys who wrote the Constitution that the document, lacking his own radiant input, is "fundamentally flawed".

Likewise, he has also chided the document, in bizarre Orwellian Newspeak, for being a "charter of negative liberties." Hunh? Negative liberties? That's right boys and girls. Obammy thinks the Constitution is bad because it only says what the government "can't do to you." Oh, how terrible! Much more important than those pesky negative liberties, he says, is what government "must do on your behalf." In that category, he includes the redistribution of wealth and the enforcement of "political and economic justice".

At the same time, the Great & Powerful O also chastised the Warren Court for being just too gosh darned conservative and not nearly liberal enough because they didn't "break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution." That's why Barack appointed Sotomayor as a Supreme Court Justice...no doubt she can break free of those constraints.

We won't even go there on the Constitutional issue of the whole natural-born citizen thing.

So we can clearly see that good old Juan was utterly correct in defending the Big 0, his Constitutional prowess, and his respect for the document to the washed masses at that town hall meeting. We can only hope that the citizens of Arizona are not quite out-voted by illegal, dead, and fraudulent voters yet and send our least favorite RINO packing, perhaps across the aisle, like Arlen "I am a Republican, and I am running for reelection in 2010 as a Republican on the Republican ticket" Specter.

It just goes to show how little difference there really is between Socialist Party A and Socialist Party B, other than the speed at which they're driving the bus off the cliff.